<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Filmwell &#187; Dardenne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmwell.org/tag/dardenne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmwell.org</link>
	<description>Is This a Film Blog?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Did Leigh Film Trigger New Legislation?</title>
		<link>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/07/28/leigh-film-linked-to-new-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/07/28/leigh-film-linked-to-new-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Au hasard Filmwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Short Film About Killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dardenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dekalog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errol Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy-Go-Lucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krzysztof Kieslowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Leigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Decalogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Thin Blue Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmwell.org/?p=3631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Film-makers Shaping The Course Of History
Trusted sources speculate that the 2008 hit film Happy-Go-Lucky may have triggered recent FDA approval of ground-breaking new medication, placing director Mike Leigh among a small but influential group of film-makers that includes such luminaries as Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, Errol Morris, and Krzysztof Kieslowski.
The landmark Errol Morris documentary The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3154" title="happy-go-lucky-poster" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/happy-go-lucky-poster.jpg" alt="happy-go-lucky-poster" width="276" height="398" /></p>
<p><strong>Film-makers Shaping The Course Of History</strong></p>
<p>Trusted sources speculate that the 2008 hit film <em>Happy-Go-Lucky</em> may have triggered recent FDA approval of ground-breaking new medication, placing director Mike Leigh among a small but influential group of film-makers that includes such luminaries as Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, Errol Morris, and Krzysztof Kieslowski.</p>
<p>The landmark Errol Morris documentary <em>The Thin Blue Line</em> (1988) challenged the capital murder conviction of Randall Adams, and led to Adams&#8217; release from prison in March 1989 (<a href="http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/2001-09-01/texana3">Texas Monthly</a>). <em>A Short Film About Killing</em> (&#8221;Krótki film o zabijaniu&#8221; Krzysztof Kieslowski, 1988) contributed to Poland&#8217;s 1989 moratorium on executions (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2003/oct/03/1">The Guardian</a>), and the Dardenne brothers&#8217; 1999 Palme d&#8217;Or recipient <em>Rosetta</em> inspired Belgium&#8217;s &#8220;Rosetta Plan,&#8221; reforming youth employment legislation in that country (<a href="http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/1999/11/feature/be9911307f.htm">European Industrial Relations Observatory</a>).</p>
<p>Now it appears that Mike Leigh&#8217;s <em>Happy-Go-Lucky</em> (2008) may have provided the impetus for U.S. lawmakers to approve new medication which offers the hope of a normal life to an estimated 20 million Americans, and relief to their long-suffering families, friends and co-workers.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/jd4tugPM83c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jd4tugPM83c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/07/28/leigh-film-linked-to-new-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lahr Vid Clip: L&#8217;Enfant</title>
		<link>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/06/01/lahr-vid-clip-lenfant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/06/01/lahr-vid-clip-lenfant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Au hasard Filmwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dardenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L'Enfant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickpocket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmwell.org/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Richard Lahr&#8217;s &#8220;Front Row&#8221; blog, which he does for The New Yorker, features a video clip where Lahr talks about symbolic elements in Dardenne films, and notes their atypical reference to another film (to Pickpocket, in L&#8217;Enfant). I strongly suggest you don&#8217;t watch the clip until you&#8217;ve seen L&#8217;Enfant, as he opens the video with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2161" title="lenfant_4" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lenfant_4-300x178.jpg" alt="lenfant_4" width="300" height="178" /></p>
<p>Richard Lahr&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/movies/2009/05/street-signs.html">Front Row</a>&#8221; blog, which he does for The New Yorker, features a video clip where Lahr talks about symbolic elements in Dardenne films, and notes their atypical reference to another film (to <em>Pickpocket</em>, in <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em>). I strongly suggest you don&#8217;t watch the clip until you&#8217;ve seen <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em>, as he opens the video with the film&#8217;s big revelation, and then goes on to consider its ending.</p>
<p>(In fact, if you&#8217;ve not seen <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em>, I have two very strong recommendations for you: 1) go rent the film and watch it, and 2), don&#8217;t read <em>anything</em> about the film before watching it, not even the back of the dvd case. As with all Dardenne films, best you should let the filmmakers have their way with you, discover what they choose to reveal exactly when and exactly how they choose to reveal it.)</p>
<p>Also best to skip the clip until you&#8217;ve also seen <em>Pickpocket</em> &#8211; I had to bail part way through, as the Bresson film hasn&#8217;t made it to the top of my queue yet. Soon. Then I&#8217;ll be back to check out the rest of what Mr Lahr has to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/06/01/lahr-vid-clip-lenfant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Apple &amp; Les Fils Dardennes</title>
		<link>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/05/27/the-big-apple-les-fils-dardennes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/05/27/the-big-apple-les-fils-dardennes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineaste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dardenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Cummings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filmjourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L'Enfant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Le Fils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lorna's Silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luc and Jean-Pierre Dardenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickpocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promesse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramin Bahrani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Porton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Son]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmwell.org/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's it. I'm moving to Manhattan. This afternoon. Friday at the latest. "Beyond L'Enfant: The Complete Dardenne Brothers" launches today at Lincoln Centre, and while the Dardenne-a-thon may be less complete than advertised, I'd give my last Belgian waffle to be there Friday when Jean-Pierre and Luc take the stage. Also, Bahrani vs The Brothers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1924" title="l_enfant_1_groot2" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/l_enfant_1_groot2-300x200.jpg" alt="l_enfant_1_groot2" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s it. I&#8217;m moving to Manhattan. This afternoon. Friday at the latest.</p>
<p>Today the Film Society of Lincoln Centre launches &#8220;<a href="http://www.filmlinc.com/wrt/onsale/dardenne/program.html">Beyond L&#8217;Enfant: The Complete Dardenne Brothers</a>&#8221; with two screenings and the opening of an exhibition of photographs by Christine Plenus, the Dardenne set photographer. Friday night is The Big Event, as Kent Jones hosts a conversation with Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, &#8220;an intimate look at their lives behind the lens.&#8221; (Sounds a bit People Magazine, don&#8217;t you think? Got a hunch it won&#8217;t be.)</p>
<p>Series continues through June 2 with screenings of the Belgian Bros&#8217; masterpieces <em>Rosetta</em>, <em>La Promesse</em>, <em>Le Fils</em> – as well as many of their early documentary films;<br />
<em>Lorsque le bateau de Léon M. descendit la Meuse pour la première fois</em> (1979, 40 min)<br />
<em>Pour que la guerre s’achève, les murs devaient s’écrouter</em> (1980, 52 min)<br />
<em>R&#8230; ne répond plus</em> (1981, 52 min)<br />
<em>Leçons d&#8217;une université volante</em> (1982, 55 min)<br />
<em>Regard Jonathan. Jean Louvet, son oeuvre</em> (1983, 57 min)<br />
<em>Falsch</em> (1983, 82 min)<br />
<em>Il court&#8230; il court le monde</em> (1987, 10 min)<br />
<em>Je Pense à vous</em> (1992, 95 min)<br />
<em><a href="http://soulfoodmovies.blogspot.com/2006/07/la-promesse.html">La Promesse</a></em> (&#8221;The Promise&#8221; 1996, 90 min)<br />
<em><a href="http://soulfoodmovies.blogspot.com/2006/07/rosetta.html">Rosetta</a></em> (1999, 95 min)<br />
<em><a href="http://soulfoodmovies.blogspot.com/2006/07/son.html">Le Fils</a></em> (&#8221;The Son&#8221; 2002, 103 min)<br />
<em><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/reviews/2006/lenfant.html">L&#8217;Enfant</a></em> (&#8221;The Child&#8221; 2005, 100 min)</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1928" title="lornassilence088" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/lornassilence088-210x300.jpg" alt="lornassilence088" width="210" height="300" /></p>
<p>Curiously, it looks like pretty much the only film that won&#8217;t be playing the Walter Reade will be the Dardennes&#8217; most recent, their 2008 Cannes entry <em>Lorna&#8217;s Silence</em> (&#8221;Le Silence de Lorna&#8221; 2008) – or, I suppose, the brilliant short they created for the 2007 festival, <em><a href="http://filmjourney.weblogger.com/2007/07/22/dans-lobscurite/#more-649">Dans l&#8217;Obscurite</a></em>. (Anybody wonder if there&#8217;s a masters thesis in there somewhere? Silence, darkness, Belgium&#8230;)</p>
<p><em>Lorna</em> didn&#8217;t receive the universal acclaim of <em>Le Fils</em> or <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em> – tough acts to follow, both having won the <em>Palme d&#8217;Or</em>.  Doug Cummings, whose essay &#8220;The Brothers Dardenne: Responding to the Face of the Other&#8221; is a centrepiece of the recent <a href="http://www.c-s-p.org/Flyers/978-1-4438-0009-9-sample.pdf">Faith and Spirituality in Masters of World Cinema</a>, wonders whether that muted response might be something of a reaction against the Dardennes&#8217; back-to-back fronds, and urges a reconsideration of <em>Lorna&#8217;s</em> merits. (Because Cummings deals specifically with the film&#8217;s ending, I&#8217;ll be waiting to read the whole article until I&#8217;ve had a chance to see the film myself, when Sony Classics releases the <em>Lorna&#8217;s Silence</em> DVD in August. But if you just can&#8217;t wait three months to read M. Cummings on les Dardennes, let me point you to his <a href="http://filmjourney.weblogger.com/2006/03/23/interview-with-the-dardennes/#more-582">interview</a> with the boys, or his <a href="http://filmjourney.weblogger.com/2006/04/02/puiu-and-dardenne-documentaries/#more-583">notes on their early films</a> (continued <a href="http://filmjourney.weblogger.com/2006/04/07/dardenne-documentaries-contd/#more-585">here</a>), all at <a href="http://filmjourney.weblogger.com/">filmjourney</a>.)</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-1873 alignnone" title="prechop_shop_poster-1" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/prechop_shop_poster-1-202x300.jpg" alt="prechop_shop_poster-1" width="202" height="300" /></p>
<p>Lest we think it&#8217;s all one big love-fest between La Pomme Grande and Les Freres du Belgium, let me piss you off with this chunk of Richard Porton&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cineaste.com/articles/an-interview-with-ramin-bahrani.htm">Cineaste interview</a> with (then) New York film director <a href="http://www.filmwell.org/2009/03/24/goodbye-solo-this-american-life-and-ramin-bahrani/">Ramin Bahrani</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Cineaste</strong>: Endings are tricky. Even with a film like the Dardenne Brothers&#8217; <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em>, the ending injects a note of phony redemption, a steal from Bresson&#8217;s <em>Pickpocket</em> (1959, France, Robert Bresson).</p>
<p><strong>Bahrani</strong>: Yes, I agree with you. The Dardennes are great filmmakers. But the ending of <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em> is unacceptable. When I compare the ending of my film with the Dardennes,&#8217; it seems to me that they&#8217;re very &#8220;moral&#8221; filmmakers while I&#8217;m not. In other words, I don&#8217;t put a knife in your stomach at the end with the heavy weight of morality. All their films seem to have this, with the possible exception of <em>La Promesse</em>. I love their films, and even many of the endings of films such as <em>Rosetta</em> and <em>Le fils</em>. But moral endings aren&#8217;t true to life since life has no intrinsic morality. If you look at Persian poetry, it has an acceptance of life as it is. That&#8217;s disturbing to most American viewers and you don&#8217;t find it much in American movies. I find the opposite disturbing. Some viewers found the ending of <em>Man Push Cart</em> (2005, USA, Ramin Bahrani) despairing. But I didn&#8217;t.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fact is, I don&#8217;t mind being pissed off by so fine a filmmaker as Bahrani (or so fine a rag as Cineaste, for that matter). I admire <em>Chop Shop</em> (2007, USA, Ramin Bahrani) – for many of the reasons I appreciate the Dardennes&#8217; films, particularly his determination neither to sentimentalize nor to preach. To my mind, there&#8217;s a significant difference between moral and moralistic, between redemption and phony redemption, and Luc and Jean-Pierre are always on the right side of that divide. I found the final scene in <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em> to be powerful and, yes, redemptive – but certainly not phony. I think it one of the most <em>well</em>-earned dawnings of conscience in cinema, earned by every gruelling frame of the extended chase sequence that precedes it. (And this from me, who hates chase sequences). Still&#8230; When one rigorous film-maker questions the rigour of another rigourous film-maker (or two) – film-makers he respects so highly, and for obvious reasons – I&#8217;m listening. The very fact that the concluding scene echoes another film so closely, and intentionally, raises the question whether the event and behaviours rise organically from the present story, or if they might be tainted – however subtly – with something not entirely organic. Which might be to say, &#8220;phony.&#8221; <em>Pickpocket</em> is on my summer viewing list: I think I need to follow that up by revisiting <em>L&#8217;Enfant</em>, to see how that ending sits now. But for now, colour me pissed off.</p>
<p>(Realizing he can&#8217;t leave this alone, Reed continues:) I mean, don&#8217;t you find the interviewer and his lead-off, leading question galling? Coming from Cineaste, of all places! The most moralistic of all movie mags, with its self-righteous (or should that be &#8220;righteous&#8221;?) mission to be &#8220;America&#8217;s <em>leading</em> Magazine on the Art and Politics of the Cinema.&#8221; If anybody cares about the ethics, conscience, dare I say the morality of film, it&#8217;s Cineaste. But I guess it has to be precisely <em>their</em> moralism, or else it&#8217;s moral<em>istic</em>? Hope Porton shows up Friday night. I bet Luc and Jean-Pierre could take him in a fight&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-1874 alignnone" title="son" src="http://www.filmwell.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/son.jpg" alt="son" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>PS If you can&#8217;t get to NYC by Friday, or if you find the prospect of a Belgium vs Cineaste grudge match less than appealing, you can stay right there in front of your computer and take in the Dardennes&#8217; recent <a href="http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/theDailyArticle/56621.html">directing master class</a> at Cannes&#8230; (Thanks, Jeff.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmwell.org/2009/05/27/the-big-apple-les-fils-dardennes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
